When
members of both sexes receive their education jointly, the need for
separate institutions disappears. This seems an advantage from the
economic point of view since separate buildings and separate teaching
and clerical staffs for those institutions would mean twice the
expenditure that would be required for running co-education institutions
would have to be double the number of separate institutions for boys
and girls, and the total expenditure in the reckoning would be the same
in both cases.But co-education has other and more important advantages.
It enables the two sexes to come into contact with, and learn to
understand, one another. They receive their lessons jointly; they plan
on the fields together; they participate in the extra-moral and
extra-curriculum activities together; they hold joint concerts; they go
out for excursions and educational tours together, in short, they get
real opportunities to get to know one another. When free contact between
the sexes is allowed and encouraged, there will be little sex
suppression on either side. It is a psychological fact that the
segregation of the sexes leads to many complexes.The age of puberty is
crucial both for boys and girls, and if they get no chance to meet one
another they are tormented by healthy and morbid thoughts.
Co-education
also enables the two sexes to study each other’s habits, inclinations,
hobbies and ways of thinking. A mutual knowledge of each other’s
psychology and temperament leads to a better understanding. This
understanding contributes, at a later stage, to married happiness, as it
enables men and women to adjust themselves to their partners in the
light of the experience they have acquired. The mutual under-standing
brought about by co-education also compels the men folk to give to women
a high status in social life.
Again,
the presence of girls in educational institutions has a refining effect
on boys. Generally, boys, if left to them, will show a tendency to
indulge in vulgar talk and indecent jokes. If however a group of
students standing the chatting together includes a few girls, the boys
will take care not to use any vulgar expressions.
Another
good effect of co-educational that it produces a healthy spirit of
academic competition between boys and girls. Each sex makes effort to
excel the others. Both are, therefore, urged to a more fruitful
intellectual exertion that in the case separate institutions for boys
and girls.
Co-education
has, however, its faults and drawbacks that should be clearly
recognized. In the first place, men find it difficult to concentrate
upon studies in the presence of women. The temptation to look and gaze
at a pretty face is always very stronger. Boys cannot attend
whole-heartedly to their lessons when a number of attractive girls are
sitting by their side in the class-room. In his easy “on the Need for
Quiet College,’ Stephen Leacock rightly observes that “men can’t study
when women are around,’ and that if women are into a college, they are
likely to get round some of the professors and marry them and then
good-bye to research and higher thought! In the next place, there is a
real ganger that the free intermixture of the sexes at the age of
puberty may lead to sexual misconduct. Boys will try to become intimate
with girls and girls may become the willing victims of certain wicked
boys. This sort of things is very undesirable and improper.The needs of
women, too, are different from those of men. The same curriculum cannot,
therefore, suit both the sexes. Boys and girls should not be given
exactly the same sort of education. If the lists of subjects suitable
for study by the two sexes are compared, the number of subjects common
to the lists may appear few. There is a wide difference between the
mental constitutions of the two sexes. Boys are to be prepared for
careers, girls mainly for a home life. No doubt, girls are increasingly
entering careers and professions, but the fact remains that the
essential requirements of the two sexes are different. It is desirable;
therefore, that boys and girls should be educated separately.It will
sound a reactionary step to say that the experiment of co-education
should be given up. But co-education is not really yielding very good
results. Co-education may be continued at the post-graduate level, but
in the lower classes it is not desirable. When girls become mature, they
can look after themselves, but at the under-graduate stage they are
likely to go astray if they are allowed to move freely to move freely
with boys.
No comments:
Post a Comment